ISO vs. NSO: An In-Depth Analysis of Why They Differ • Learn with Valur

Stock options are an excellent way for employees to benefit from the success of the company they work for. Still, there are several stock options, and understanding their differences can be complex. This article will discuss the critical differences between ISO vs. NSO – or Qualified Incentive Stock Options and Non-qualified Stock Options. We’ll explain the tax implications of each, the eligibility requirements, and the advantages and disadvantages of each type of stock option.

Qualified Incentive Stock Options Overview (ISOs)

Qualified Incentive Stock Options, or ISO, are a type of employee stock option that can be offered to employees of companies that are publicly traded. With an ISO, the employee is given the right to purchase a certain number of shares of the company’s stock at a pre-determined price (the “grant price”) over a certain period. These options must be exercised within ten years of the date of the grant.

The main advantage of ISOs is that they are generally taxed more favorably than NSOs. When the employee exercises their ISO and sells the stock, they will only be subject to capital gains taxes, typically lower than the taxes due on selling an NSO.

Non-Qualified Stock Options Overview (NSOs)

Non-Qualified Stock Options, or NSOs, are also employee stock options that can be offered to employees of publicly traded companies. With an NSO, the employee is given the right to purchase a certain number of shares of the company’s stock at a pre-determined price (the “grant price”) over a certain period. However, unlike ISOs, there is no requirement that the NSO be exercised within ten years of the date of the grant.

NSOs’ man advantage is that they are generally less restrictive than ISOs. Unlike ISOs, NSOs can be offered to any employee (including non-employee directors and consultants), and there is no requirement that the NSO be exercised within ten years of the grant.

Differences Between ISO vs. NSO

Tax Implications

The main difference between ISOs and NSOs is the tax implications. As mentioned above, when the employee exercises their ISO and sells the stock, they will only be subject to capital gains taxes. On the other hand, when the employee exercises their NSO and sells the store, they will be subject to both capital gains and ordinary income taxes.

Eligibility Requirements

Another difference between NSO vs. ISO is the eligibility requirements. As mentioned above, ISOs must be offered only to employees of the company and must be exercised within ten years of the grant. On the other hand, NSOs can be provided to any employee (including non-employee directors and consultants), and there is no requirement that the NSO be exercised within ten years of the grant.

Restrictions

The final difference between NSO vs. ISO stock options is the restrictions. ISOs are subject to certain conditions, such as the requirement that the option must be exercised within ten years of the grant and that the employee holds the stock for at least one year after the exercise date. On the other hand, NSOs are generally less restrictive and do not have the same restrictions as ISOs.

When are ISOs Appropriate?

When the recipient of the option has a long-term outlook for their investments and is planning to hold their shares for more than a year. ISO’s are subject to a special tax treatment that allows for capital gains tax to be deferred until the shares are sold, making them an attractive option for long-term investors.
When the option recipient is in a lower tax bracket. With ISO, the recipient can defer paying taxes on the gains until the shares are sold, meaning that if the recipient is in a lower tax bracket when the stakes are sold, the amount of taxes owed on the gains will be lower than with a non-qualified option.
When the option recipient has no plans to exercise the option. Since ISO’s are subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax, they can be a good choice for individuals with no plans to exercise the option and instead plan on selling the shares in the future.
When the option recipient is not subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax. Suppose the option recipient is not subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax. In that case, they may benefit from the tax advantages associated with ISO, as the gains from the sale of the shares will not be subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax.

When are NSOs Appropriate?

When the employee is not eligible for qualified stock options due to legal or contractual restrictions.
When the company wants to give employees an incentive to stay with the company for a longer period or to achieve specific goals.
When the employee desires long-term capital gains instead of short-term income.
When the company wants to reward employees for taking on additional risks or responsibilities.
When the company wants to reward employees for contributing to its growth.

Does ISO convert to NSO?

No, ISO (Qualified Incentive Stock Options) cannot be converted to NSO (Non-qualified Stock Options). ISO’s are subject to the special tax treatment not available for NSOs. Additionally, ISO must meet specific criteria to qualify for the tax advantages, such as the options must have held the option for at least a year before exercising it, and the option must be exercised within ten years of its grant date. NSOs do not have the exact requirements and are not eligible for the same tax advantages.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding the differences between NSO vs. ISO is essential for individuals looking to invest in a company’s stock options. ISO options provide a significant tax benefit to investors and make them more attractive than their NSO counterparts. However, NSOs are more straightforward and more flexible regarding the exercise and sale of the shares. Ultimately, the right option depends on the investor’s goals and financial needs.

Check out our glossary definitions to know more about stock options and which is best for you. Or reach out to our team if you have any questions!

About Valur

We have built a platform to give everyone access to the tax planning tools of the ultra-rich like Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook founder), Phil Knight (Nike founder), and others. Valur makes it simple and seamless for our customers to utilize the tax-advantaged structures that are otherwise expensive and inaccessible to build their wealth more efficiently. From picking the best strategy to taking care of all the setup and ongoing overhead, we make take care of it and make it easy.